The purpose of the current study was to evaluate the CPR techniques of emer
gency healthcare professionals (emergency medical technicians, firemen, eme
rgency first responders, CPR instructors). Skills were evaluated using a La
erdal Skillmeter Manikin(R), which provided a computerized printout of the
quantifiable data during the CPR sequence. All of the 66 subjects in the st
udy had completed a recertification course within the last 2 years (mean =
0.86 +/- 0.18, 95% CI). The sequence was videotaped for later viewing and f
or correlating the errors with the data. In addition, the participants were
required to fill in a questionnaire. The most frequently occurring errors
were observed in landmarking, overcompression, palpating a carotid pulse an
d insufficient ventilation. Although 98.5% of participants made an attempt
to landmark their position for compression on the sternum, 35.9% of the tot
al compressions performed by all subjects were incorrectly positioned on th
e patient's chest. Overcompression of the patient's chest accounted for 55.
3% of incorrect compressions. Although 94% of participants attempted to ver
ify a carotid pulse, only 45% were able to feel it and therefore stop perfo
rming cardiac massage. Of the total ventilations, 49% were below the Americ
an Heart Association (AHA) recommended minimum (800 ml). The results of thi
s study showed a high rate of errors occurring in the CPR provided by emerg
ency healthcare professionals. (C) 1999 Elsevier Science Ireland Ltd. All r
ights reserved.