Arguments against active tropical forest management are analyzed in light o
f available data and new research that shows tropical forests to be more re
silient after disturbances than previously thought. Tropical forest managem
ent involves a diverse array of human activity embedded in a complex social
and natural environment. Within this milieu, forest structure and composit
ion adjust to change and reflect the human and natural economy of regions.
Critics of active forest management overestimate problems and underestimate
human capacity to solve them. They isolate parts of a complex issue, i.e.
the biodiversity component of tropical forest management, to generalize abo
ut the negatives of logging. This view of the tropics is consistent with pa
st treatment of tropical issues by those that evaluate the situation from a
non-tropical perspective. The literature reveals that conservation of biod
iversity can be compatible with measured use of tropical forests. However,
the conservation of biodiversity could be hurt should society not approach
the tropical forestry issue holistically and act on misinformation. Active
forest management is the means towards the goal of conservation and the bes
t available way to simultaneously address human needs and conservation of b
iodiversity. (C) 1999 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.