Frequency and determinants of postprocedural hemodynamic instability aftercarotid angioplasty and stenting

Citation
Ai. Qureshi et al., Frequency and determinants of postprocedural hemodynamic instability aftercarotid angioplasty and stenting, STROKE, 30(10), 1999, pp. 2086-2093
Citations number
33
Categorie Soggetti
Neurology,"Cardiovascular & Hematology Research
Journal title
STROKE
ISSN journal
00392499 → ACNP
Volume
30
Issue
10
Year of publication
1999
Pages
2086 - 2093
Database
ISI
SICI code
0039-2499(199910)30:10<2086:FADOPH>2.0.ZU;2-3
Abstract
Background and Purpose-Hemodynamic instability can occur acutely after caro tid angioplasty and stent placement (CAS). We performed this study to deter mine the frequency of hemodynamic instability in a series of patients who u nderwent CAS and to analyze factors associated with development of postproc edural hemodynamic events. Methods-We reviewed medical records and angiograms in a series of 51 patien ts (mean age 68.3 +/- 8.9 years) who underwent CAS for symptomatic (n = 29) or asymptomatic (n = 22) carotid artery stenosis. Any episodes of hypotens ion (systolic blood pressure <90 mm Hg), hypertension (systolic blood press ure >160 mm Hg), or bradycardia (heart rate <60 bpm) that occurred in the a cute postprocedural period were recorded. The effect of demographic, clinic al, intraprocedural, and angiographic factors on subsequent development of hemodynamic instability was analyzed by logistic regression. Results-The frequency of postprocedural hemodynamic complications in our pa tient series was as follows: hypotension, 22.4%; hypertension, 38.8%; and b radycardia, 27.5%. Intraprocedural hypotension (odds ratio [OR] 14.6, P = 0 .024) and history of myocardial infarction (OR 14.1, P = 0.04) independentl y predicted postprocedural hypotension. Postprocedural hypertension was pre dicted by intraprocedural hypertension (OR 7.6, P = 0.01) and previous ipsi lateral carotid endarterectomy (OR 7.6, P = 0.02). Postprocedural bradycard ia was associated with intraprocedural hypotension (OR 74, P = 0.001) and i ntraprocedural bradycardia (OR 12, P = 0.008). All events had resolved at t he conclusion of the intensive care unit monitoring period (mean 25.7 hours , range 18 to 43 hours). Conclusions-Postprocedural hemodynamic instability is frequent after CAS an d supports the need for monitoring in settings suited to expeditious manage ment of cardiovascular emergencies. Patients who have evidence of hemodynam ic instability during the procedure are at highest risk.