Background and Purpose-There is still controversy about the prognostic valu
e of motor evoked potentials (MEPs) in the assessment of hemiplegia. The ai
ms of this study are to determine the relationship between functional and e
lectrophysiological recovery and thus the value of MEP as a prognostic indi
cator of clinical outcome in acute ischemic stroke.
Methods-Seventeen healthy subjects and 38 stroke patients were included in
this study. Functional recovery was assessed with the Modified Canadian Neu
rological Scale (MCNS), the Barthel Activities of Daily Living Index (BI),
and the Rankin scale. Transcranial magnetic stimulation was used to determi
ne the change in central motor conduction time (CMCT). Stroke outcome was a
ssessed at the end of 2 weeks. One-way ANOVA with post hoc comparisons usin
g the Scheffe procedure as well as t tests were used to assess the signific
ance of the results in this study.
Results-Unpaired t test showed significantly higher mean scores of the MCNS
(2P = 0.001), BT (2P = 0.002), and Rankin scale (P<0.001) at day 14 in the
group of patients with recordable MEP at day 1. A better clinical improvem
ent with a higher mean score of the MCNS (2P<0.001), BI (2P<0.001), and the
Rankin scale (2P<0.001) was also observed in the patients in whom the CMCT
improved.
Conclusions-These data show that there is a close relationship between clin
ical and electrophysiological improvement and that MEP is a useful prognost
ic indicator of clinical outcome.