V. Di Rienzo et al., Post-marketing surveillance study on the safety of sublingual immunotherapy in pediatric patients, ALLERGY, 54(10), 1999, pp. 1110-1113
Background: Immunotherapy (IT) is the only causal treatment for allergic su
bjects recognized to be effective and to offer longlasting efficacy. The no
ninjective routes, aimed at improving the safety of the treatment, have bee
n validated as effective in adults, but documentation of their safety in ch
ildren is still poor. The aim of the present survey study was to assess the
safety of sublingual immunotherapy in pediatric patients, by evaluating a
large population.
Methods: A total of 268 children (aged 2-15 years), receiving sublingual IT
for respiratory allergy, were followed-up over a period ranging from 3 mon
ths to 7 years (mean 34 months). The side-effects possibly due to the treat
ment were recorded on a proper diary card; self-assessment of the clinical
outcome was also evaluated.
Results: About 96 000 doses of extract were globally administered. Local si
de-effects were of no clinical relevance. Eight side effects were reported
(3% of patients; 0.083 per 1000 doses). Seven systemic side-effects (abdomi
nal pain, conjunctival itching, and rhinitis) were mild and. required no tr
eatment. One case of urticaria was well controlled with oral antihistamines
. No life-threatening event occurred. The clinical outcome was judged excel
lent or good by 80% of the patients.
Conclusions: The sublingual IT herein investigated appeared to be well tole
rated and safe in pediatric patients. The risk/benefit ratio was therefore
favorable.