K. Stanford et al., Use of lentil screenings in the diets of early weaned lambs and ewes in the second trimester of pregnancy, ANIM FEED S, 81(3-4), 1999, pp. 249-264
Commercial lentil screenings (LS) were substituted for barley grain and can
ola meal, and the resulting experimental diets (0, 12.5, 25 and 33% LS; 17-
18% CP dry matter) were evaluated in situ and in digestibility and feedlot
studies using Romanov x Suffolk lambs. Mature Suffolk, Dorset and Rambouill
et ewes were used to evaluate LS or whole barley as protein/energy suppleme
nts for ewes in mid-gestation receiving barley silage diets. Lentil screeni
ngs included 53.4% lentils, 10.6% weed seeds, 8.27% chaff and dust, with th
e remainder being a mixture of field peas, barley, wheat and canola. For th
e lamb trial, the control diet consisted of 62% barley, 12.5% canola meal a
nd 20% alfalfa (as fed), while for the ewe study, the control diet consiste
d of barley silage with a salt-mineral supplement. Comparing dietary consti
tuents in situ, the rates of protein and dry matter (DM) disappearance were
5-6-fold lower (p < 0.05) and effective ruminal degradability of protein (
EDCP) was also lowest (p < 0.05) for LS as compared to alfalfa or barley. D
igestibilities of DM, organic matter (OM) and neutral detergent fibre (NDF)
as well as N retention (% of N intake) linearly decreased (p < 0.001) with
increasing dietary LS, In the lamb feeding trial, average daily gain(ADG;p
< 0.01). feed intake (p < 0.01) and feed conversion efficiency (p < 0.05)
were all linearly reduced with increasing dietary LSI although such reducti
ons were not significant for ewe lambs. Reduced lamb performance with LS wa
s likely related to antinutritional factors and the reduced digestibility o
f LS. Valuing LS at 50% the cost of barley, incorporation of up to 25% LS i
n feeder lamb diets would be cost effective. In the ewe feeding study, alth
ough weight gains over the 50 days of feeding were highest (p < 0.05) in ba
rley-supplemented and LS-supplemented as compared to control ewes, LS-suppl
emented ewes had fewer (p < 0.05) lambs born per ene and reduced (p < 0.05)
weight of lambs weaned breeding per ewe as compared to control ewes. Conse
quently, supplementation of barley silage diets with LS may not be benefici
al for ewes in midgestation. (C) 1999 Elsevier Science B.V, All rights rese
rved.