Preliminary experience with the use of the Holmium-YAG laser in the treatment of soft tissues and cystine stones in children.

Citation
Lm. Fossion et al., Preliminary experience with the use of the Holmium-YAG laser in the treatment of soft tissues and cystine stones in children., ANN UROL, 33(5), 1999, pp. 320-327
Citations number
25
Categorie Soggetti
Urology & Nephrology
Journal title
ANNALES D UROLOGIE
ISSN journal
00034401 → ACNP
Volume
33
Issue
5
Year of publication
1999
Pages
320 - 327
Database
ISI
SICI code
0003-4401(1999)33:5<320:PEWTUO>2.0.ZU;2-V
Abstract
Introduction: Experience of the use of the Holmium : Yttrium-Aluminium-Garn et (Ho:YAG) laser in children has been limited. However, the Ho:YAG laser h as been in clinical use in urology for several years but has mainly been us ed for the treatment of renal stones and benign prostatic hyperplasia. Due to its unique combination of vaporization and coagulation, the Ho:YAG laser allows a precise cutting action. The depth of penetration in water and tis sue is limited to < 0.5 nlm and therefore provides a safety margin. The Ho: YAG laser can be used in children, as the energy can be delivered via fiber s that range from 200 to 1000 mu in diameter. Materials and Methods: We use d the Ho:YAG laser in 5 children (2-15 years): one child (2 years) with bla dder exstrophy had a urethral stricture after bladder neck reconstruction, two children (6 years and 14 years) had ureteropelvic junction (UPJ) stenos is and refused open surgery and two children (5 years and 15 years) suffere d from cystine stones (ESWL failed). The urethral stricture was incised in a retrograde fashion. We performed an antegrade incision of the UPJ with th e Ho:YAG laser in the 6-year-old child and a retrograde incision in the 14- year-old child. We removed the stones in antegrade fashion in the 5-year-ol d child and in retrograde fashion in the 15-year-old child. Results: All ch ildren now have more than 12 month's followup. There were no immediate or l ate complications. The boy with urethral stricture remained free of recurre nce, the boy with UPJ stenosis obtained improved drainage on the excretory renogram and the two children with cystine stones remained stonefree. Concl usion : We have shown that the safety and efficacy of the Ho:YAG laser is a lso reproducible in urologic pathology in children. In addition, due to its vaporizing quality, the Ho:YAG laser is more effective in the treatment of cystine stones and allows minimaly invasive treatment in children.