E. Rozin and P. Rozin have suggested that one of the functions of "flavor p
rinciples" (the distinctive seasoning combinations which characterize many
cuisines) is to facilitate the introduction of novel staple foods into a cu
lture by adding sufficient familiarity to decrease the neophobia ordinarily
produced by a new food. We tested this idea experimentally, predicting tha
t the addition of a familiar flavor principle to a novel food would increas
e individuals' willingness to taste it, in comparison to their willingness
to taste the same food in the absence of the flavor principle. Since people
have little reluctance to approach familiar foods, addition of a familiar
flavor principle to a familiar food should have little effect on willingnes
s to taste it. In a pilot study, subjects selected from a list, a sauce whi
ch was high in familiarity and liking for them. They then rated their willi
ngness to taste one novel and one familiar food with the sauce and one of e
ach with no sauce. Subjects did not actually see any foods-the familiar and
novel foods were simply described-and they were aware that they would not
actually be tasting any foods. In the study proper, subjects rated their wi
llingness to try each of the four food/sauce combinations described above.
In this study, they actually saw the foods they were rating and were under
the impression their ratings would determine what they would taste later in
the study. In both studies, the addition of a familiar sauce to a novel fo
od increased subjects' willingness to taste it tin comparison to the same f
ood with no sauce) while the addition of a sauce to a familiar food either
had no effect or decreased subjects' willingness to taste it. In the pilot
study, the "flavor principle" effect interacted with subjects' levels of fo
od adventurousness. (C) 1999 Academic Press.