Ae. Fletcher et al., Low uptake of eye services in rural India - A challenge for programs of blindness prevention, ARCH OPHTH, 117(10), 1999, pp. 1393-1399
Objectives: To investigate service uptake in a rural Indian population serv
ed by outreach eye camps and to identify barriers to uptake.
Participants and Methods: A routine eye camp was conducted within 5 km of e
ach of 48 randomly selected villages of typically Hindu, backward-caste com
munities. Subsequently, participatory rural appraisal-community mapping, fo
cus groups, matrix ranking, and semistructured interviews-was undertaken to
explore community views of eye problems. An eye examination was conducted
on persons with eye problems who did not attend the eve camp. Predictors of
attendance were identified by multilevel regression analysis.
Results: Of 749 adults with an eye problem, 51 (6.8%) attended the eve camp
. Independent predictors of attendance were be: mg male (odds ratio = 2.3;
95% confidence interval, 1.2-4.5) and living within 3 km of the camp (odds
ratio = 4.5; 95% confidence interval, 1.7-12.5). Of the 552 persons who did
not attend the eye camps and had an eye examination, 242 (43.8%) had low v
ision (visual acuity <6/18 to greater than or equal to 3/60 in presenting b
etter eye) and 38 (6.9%) were blind in both eyes. Cataract surgery was reco
mmended for 197 (35.8%) of the persons who did not attend the eye camps. Of
109 persons with a previous cataract operation, 42 (38.5%) had low vision
and 11 (10.1%) were blind. Fear (principally of eye damage), cost (direct a
nd indirect), family responsibilities, ageism, fatalism, and an attitude of
being able to cope (with low or no vision) were the principal barriers to
attending the eye camps.
Conclusions: A high proportion of people who could have benefited from eye
treatment were not using available services. Poor visual outcomes were obse
rved in surgically treated persons.