D. Oh et Ra. Prayson, Evaluation of epithelial and keratin markers in glioblastoma multiforme - An immunohistochemical study, ARCH PATH L, 123(10), 1999, pp. 917-920
Citations number
23
Categorie Soggetti
Research/Laboratory Medicine & Medical Tecnology","Medical Research Diagnosis & Treatment
Objective.-Poorly differentiated metastatic carcinoma may be difficult to d
istinguish histologically from high-grade astrocytic malignant neoplasms, p
articularly on small open or stereotactic biopsy specimens. Previous author
s have reported that a subset of glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) variably sta
ins with cytokeratin immunomarkers. The authors examined a panel of epithel
ial and keratin antibodies by paraffin immunohistochemistry to evaluate the
immunophenotype of CBM for these markers and to determine what combination
of immunostains would be optimal in distinguishing GBM from metastatic car
cinoma.
Methods.-Twenty-three patients with GEM (age range, 19-86 years; mean, 63.4
years; 14 men and 9 women) and 22 patients with metastatic carcinoma (age
range, 26-77 years; mean, 58.1 years; 7 men and 15 women) to the brain were
studied with a panel of immunostains, including glial fibrillary acid prot
ein (GFAP), Ber-EP4, antikeratin monoclonal antibodies AE1/3, and antibodie
s to CAM 5.2 and cytokeratins 7 (CK7) and 20 (CK20). Sites of origin for th
e metastatic tumors included lung (n = 11), breast (n = 5), endometrium (n
= 1), prostate (n = 1), colon (n = 1), presumed kidney (n = 1), and unknown
(n = 2).
Results.-All GBMs stained positive for GFAP (100%), and all but 1 (95.7%) s
tained positive for cytokeratins AE1/3. Only rare focal immunoreactivity wa
s observed in a single case of GEM with CAM 5.2 (4.3%), CK7 (4.3%), and CK2
0 (4.3%). Immunoreactivity with Ber-EP4 was not observed in any of the GBMs
(0.0%). All cases of metastatic carcinoma stained positive with cytokerati
ns AE1/3 (100%) and CAM 5.2 (100%). Variable staining was observed in carci
nomas with CK7 (17 of 22, 77.3%), Ber-EP4 (11 of 22, 50.0%), and CK20 (9 of
22, 40.9%). Three metastatic carcinomas showed rare GFAP-positive staining
cells (13.6%).
Conclusions.-Based on the aforementioned results, a combination of immunost
ains, including GFAP and cytokeratin CAM5.2, may be the most useful in diff
erentiating poorly differentiated metastatic carcinoma from GBM. A signific
ant number of GBMs stain with some cytokeratin markers, in particular cytok
eratins AE1/3. Because of the poor specificity of cytokeratins AE1/3 in dis
tinguishing metastatic carcinoma from GBM, it should not be used to differe
ntiate the 2 entities.