Research on the that S-not-all compliance procedure finds that making a req
uest more attractive before the recipient has an opportunity to respond inc
reases compliance beyond that of recipients who receive only the final vers
ion of the request. However, participants in Studies 1 and 2 presented with
an improved offer before responding to a request were significantly less l
ikely to agree to the final request than those not exposed to the technique
. Studies 3 and 4 demonstrated that this reversal is a function of the size
of the initial request. Compared to a control group receiving only the fin
al request, participants presented with an initial request that was substan
tially larger than the final request were less likely to comply, whereas pa
rticipants presented with an initial request that was only slightly larger
than the final request were more likely to comply. The findings suggest an
important limit to the application of the that's-not-all technique.