COMPARATIVE MORPHOMETRIC STUDY OF IMMUNOHISTOCHEMICAL VERSUS CONVENTIONAL STAINING FOR THE EVALUATION OF MEGAKARYOCYTOPOIESIS IN NORMAL ANDPATHOLOGICAL BONE-MARROW BIOPSIES
D. Marisavljevic et al., COMPARATIVE MORPHOMETRIC STUDY OF IMMUNOHISTOCHEMICAL VERSUS CONVENTIONAL STAINING FOR THE EVALUATION OF MEGAKARYOCYTOPOIESIS IN NORMAL ANDPATHOLOGICAL BONE-MARROW BIOPSIES, Pathology international, 47(5), 1997, pp. 301-307
Identification of megakaryocytes by immunohistochemistry may be superi
or to hematoxylin-eosin (HE) stain method for assessing megakaryocyte
size and number in clinical specimens; however, a side-by-side compari
son of the two methods has not been reported. In the present study, co
mparative morphometry using both methods was performed on marrow biops
ies of normal individuals, and of patients with myelodysplastic syndro
me, chronic myeloid leukemia and immune thrombocytopenia. Morphometric
results in the present study showed that precise megakaryocyte size c
an be calculated in normal and pathologic bone marrow sections by usin
g HE stain if one employs stereological corrections. In contrast, mega
karyocyte numbers can be more precisely detected by immunohistochemist
ry than by HE stain, particularly in myelodysplastic syndrome and chro
nic myeloid leukemia. Differentiation disturbances and ineffective meg
akaryocytopoiesis in myelodysplastic syndrome were demonstrated by imm
unomorphometric analyses.