GLUCOCORTICOID-XENOBIOTIC INTERACTIONS - DEXAMETHASONE-MEDIATED POTENTIATION OF CYTOCHROME P4501A INDUCTION BY BETA-NAPHTHOFLAVONE IN A FISH HEPATOMA-CELL LINE (PLHC-1)

Citation
M. Celander et al., GLUCOCORTICOID-XENOBIOTIC INTERACTIONS - DEXAMETHASONE-MEDIATED POTENTIATION OF CYTOCHROME P4501A INDUCTION BY BETA-NAPHTHOFLAVONE IN A FISH HEPATOMA-CELL LINE (PLHC-1), Environmental toxicology and chemistry, 16(5), 1997, pp. 900-907
Citations number
34
Categorie Soggetti
Toxicology,"Environmental Sciences",Chemistry
ISSN journal
07307268
Volume
16
Issue
5
Year of publication
1997
Pages
900 - 907
Database
ISI
SICI code
0730-7268(1997)16:5<900:GI-DP>2.0.ZU;2-3
Abstract
The induction of CYP1A by the polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH)-ty pe inducer beta-naphthoflavone (BNF) in the Poeciliopsis-lucida hepato cellular carcinoma cell line (PLHC-1), and the effects of the glucocor ticoid receptor (GR) agonist dexamethasone (DEX) on this response were examined. Dose-response studies revealed that BNF is three orders of magnitude less potent than the planar halogenated aromatic hydrocarbon 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) as an inducer of the CYP1A activity ethoxyresorufin-O-deethylase (EROD), and that the apparent e fficacy for the induction by BNF is 50% of that obtained with TCDD. Ad dition of 10 mu M DEX resulted In potentiation of CYP1A induction at a ll doses bi. BNF tested. The degree of that potentiation of induction of CYP1A protein levels and EROD activity differed substantially betwe en doses of BNF and at different times of exposure. For example, the m aximal degree of potentiation of EROD induction by DEX was 12-fold in PLHC-1 cells treated with 0.1 mu M BNF 19-fold in cells treated with 1 mu M BNF, and 8-fold in cells treated with 10 mu M BNF These maximal degrees of potentiation of EROD induction were obtained after 30 h wit h 0.1 mu M BNF, 48 h with 1 mu M BNF and 72 h with 10 mu M BNF. These results demonstrate interactions between GR and aryl hydrocarbon recep tor pathways that could influence the response of fish to xenobiotic e xposure.