Only a few markers have been instrumental in the diagnosis of cancer. In co
ntrast, tumor markers play a critical role in the monitoring of patients. T
he patient's clinical status and response to treatment can be evaluated rap
idly using the tumor marker half-life (t(1/2)) and the tumor marker doublin
g time (DT). This report reviews the interest of determining these kinetic
parameters for prostate-specific antigen, human chorionic gonadotropin, alp
ha-fetoprotein, carcinoembryonic antigen, cancer antigen (CA) 125, and CA 1
5-3. A rise in tumor markers (DT) is a yardstick with which benign diseases
can be distinguished from metastatic disease, and the DT can be used to as
sess the efficacy of treatments. A decline in the tumor marker concentratio
n (t(1/2)) is a predictor of possible residual disease if the timing of blo
od sampling is soon after therapy. The discrepancies in results obtained by
different groups may be attributable to the multiplicity of immunoassays,
the intrinsic characteristics of each marker (e.g., antigen specificity, mo
lecular heterogeneity, and associated forms), individual factors (e.g., non
specific increases and renal and hepatic diseases) and methods used to calc
ulate kinetics (e.g., exponential models and timing of blood sampling). Thi
s kinetic approach could be of interest to optimize patient management. (C)
1999 American Association for Clinical Chemistry.