Dynamic volume rendered three-dimensional echocardiography allows the spati
al recognition. of anatomy and function, of the aortic and mitral valves wi
th acceptable image quality. The aortic value can be best visualized in a v
iew from the ascending aorta down to the valve level, thus allowing an over
view of the aortic aspect of the valve in a surgeon's perspective in simila
r to 80% of patients. Planimetric measurement of the aortic valve area was
possible in 88% of patients, and there is no systematic overestimation or u
nderestimation of aortic valve area compared with two-dimensional echocardi
ography and catheterization. The entire valvular circumference of the mitra
l valve can be assessed from both a left atrial and a left ventricular pers
pective. Advantages of the three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiograp
hy mitral valve area determination compared with transthoracic two-dimensio
nal planimetry and Doppler-derived pressure half-time method are present in
patients with severely calcified mitral valves and in, those with combined
aortic regurgitation.