This article describes a flexible, dynamic system for comparing antiepilept
ic drugs (AEDs) as monotherapy, taking into account the needs of the patien
t and the characteristics of the treatment. Because differences in efficacy
between AEDs cannot readily be demonstrated in regulatory clinical trials,
safety is of paramount importance. Each drug has been judged across 11 cri
teria. These include knowledge of mechanism of action, suitable pharmacokin
etics, drug interactions, delineated range of efficacy, ease of titration,
idiosyncratic reactions, sedative burden, neuropsychiatric profile, teratog
enic potential, and the likelihood of producing long-term side effects. The
final consideration relates to how "comfortable" the doctor is with prescr
ibing the drug as monotherapy. Scores of -1 (drawback), 0 (neutral/unknown)
, or +1 (advantage) have been allocated under each category, depending on c
urrent knowledge and clinical experience. The sum of the individual scores
determines the awarding of "stars." In addition, the positive and negative
features of each AED, when used as monotherapy, are highlighted. A range of
established and new AEDs has been examined using the "monostars" method, i
ncluding phenobarbital, phenytoin, carbamazepine, sodium valproate, lamotri
gine, gabapentin, oxcarbazepine, and vigabatrin, Scores can be adjusted as
new information comes to light. Other agents can be added when suitable mon
otherapy da;a become available. This analysis supports the contention that
choice of treatment in newly diagnosed epilepsy should take into considerat
ion the patient's age, sex, general health, coexisting disabilities, concom
itant medication, and life style. Seizure type, syndrome, and the AED's pha
rmacology, efficacy, and safety profile should also be considered. Because
dosing is often modest, cost should rarely be the overriding factor in choo
sing a drug for a patient with newly diagnosed epilepsy in the developed wo
rld. With these criteria, some of the newer AEDs have potentially more to o
ffer the patient as monotherapy than do the established agents.