Eversion endarterectomy versus open thromboendarterectomy and patch plastyfor the treatment of internal carotid artery stenosis

Citation
C. Peiper et al., Eversion endarterectomy versus open thromboendarterectomy and patch plastyfor the treatment of internal carotid artery stenosis, EUR J VAS E, 18(4), 1999, pp. 339-343
Citations number
25
Categorie Soggetti
Surgery
Journal title
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY
ISSN journal
10785884 → ACNP
Volume
18
Issue
4
Year of publication
1999
Pages
339 - 343
Database
ISI
SICI code
1078-5884(199910)18:4<339:EEVOTA>2.0.ZU;2-X
Abstract
Objective: in 1996 we changed our treatment for stenosis of the internal ca rotid artery (ICA) from open thromboendarterectomy and PTFE-patch plasty (T EA) to eversion endarterectomy (EEA). Design: retrospective study. Methods: a total of 475 EEAs of the ICA were performed between 2/96 and 11/ 96. These results were compared to the results of TEA carried out between 2 /94 and 11/94 (n = 388). Results: clamping and operation time were significantly shorter for EEA. Ne urological complications included transient ischaemic attacks in 1.0% in th e EEA group versus 1.3% after TEA (p = 0.72), minor strokes (0.6% vs. 1.8%, p = 0.10) and major strokes in 1.5% versus 1.1% (p = 0.59). The rate of re stenosis >50% was 2.5% after EEA and 10.2% after TEA. The only detectable d ifference of statistical significance in complication rates was in the lesi ons of the hypoglossal nerve (5.3% vs. 2.6%, p = 0.04). Conclusions: EEA of the ICA is a safe procedure for carotid reconstruction with the additional advantages of short clamping time, possibility of simul taneous shortening of an elongated ICA, and no requirement for patching.