M. Sillem et al., Add-back medrogestone does not prevent bone loss in premenopausal women treated with goserelin, EXP CL E D, 107(6), 1999, pp. 379-385
Citations number
37
Categorie Soggetti
Endocrinology, Nutrition & Metabolism
Journal title
EXPERIMENTAL AND CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY & DIABETES
To investigate the effect of medrogestone on bone mineral density (BMD) and
bone turnover under conditions of estrogen withdrawal, premenopausal women
with endometriosis were treated with goserelin (Zoladex(R)), combined with
either placebo (group A, n = 12) or 10 mg medrogestone (Prothil(R), group
B, n = 11) for six months, and followed for an additional six months. Lumba
r spine BMD was measured at 0 and 6 month. Markers of bone turnover were se
rum bone alkaline phosphatase (sBAP) and osteocalcin (sOC) by ELISA, and ur
inary total pyridinoline (uPYD) and deoxypyridinoline crosslinks (uDPD) by
HPLC.
Patients in both groups had a similar and significant decrease BMD after 6
months (4%, p < 0.01). The time course of changes in bone turnover, in cont
rast, was different in both groups. In group A, crosslink excretion increas
ed from one month onwards, while no changes were seen in group B. In group
A, sBAP levels rose during treatment, while in group B, this rise was delay
ed until treatment was terminated. Additionally, group B showed an initial
suppression of sBAP and sOC. In both groups, sOC increased after treatment
was discontinued.
Medrogestone at 10 mg/d does not prevent lumbar bone loss in premenopausal
women under estrogen deprivation. In the medrogestone add back group, the c
hanges in bone turnover are compatible with low turnover bone loss,as oppos
ed to a state of high turnover seen in the unopposed goserelin group. This
effect may be due to glucocorticoid receptor mediated actions of medrogesto
ne on bone.