Lakoff(1987, 1993) has argued that the comprehension of metaphorical langua
ge is mediated by metaphoric correspondences that structure our understandi
ng of abstract concepts. We take issue with the assumptions of this argumen
t and discuss the lack of empirical support for several predictions that fo
llow from it. As an alternative, we propose a 'minimalist' account of metap
hor in which comprehension is conceived as a search for an 'attributive cat
egory' that is exemplified by the metaphor vehicle. (C) 1999 Elsevier Scien
ce B.V. All rights reserved.