Urine screening is a potentially useful tool for detecting drugs of abuse i
n treatment, criminal justice, and other human service settings. This artic
le examines the relative accuracy and other features of three drug screenin
g assays sold by commercial laboratories: (1) Abbott Diagnostics ADx machin
e and reagents; (2) OMTRAK, manufactured by Roche Diagnostics; and (3) EZ-S
CREEN, manufactured by Environmental Diagnostics. Urine samples (n=345) wer
e collected from indigent men and women in a work and life skills program,
and tested for cocaine and opiates with each of the kits. The ADx fluoresce
nt immunoassay was presumed to be the most sensitive and specific screening
method, and comparisons with the two visually-determined test kits support
ed this assumption. Of the two visual test kits, ONTRAK was the more specif
ic assay and was lower in cost and simplest to perform. Decision makers cou
ld employ similar evaluative methods in selecting drug testing materials.