Detecting cocaine and opiates in urine: Comparing three commercial assays

Citation
Rf. Schilling et al., Detecting cocaine and opiates in urine: Comparing three commercial assays, J PSYCH DR, 31(3), 1999, pp. 305-313
Citations number
17
Categorie Soggetti
Psycology
Journal title
JOURNAL OF PSYCHOACTIVE DRUGS
ISSN journal
02791072 → ACNP
Volume
31
Issue
3
Year of publication
1999
Pages
305 - 313
Database
ISI
SICI code
0279-1072(199907/09)31:3<305:DCAOIU>2.0.ZU;2-D
Abstract
Urine screening is a potentially useful tool for detecting drugs of abuse i n treatment, criminal justice, and other human service settings. This artic le examines the relative accuracy and other features of three drug screenin g assays sold by commercial laboratories: (1) Abbott Diagnostics ADx machin e and reagents; (2) OMTRAK, manufactured by Roche Diagnostics; and (3) EZ-S CREEN, manufactured by Environmental Diagnostics. Urine samples (n=345) wer e collected from indigent men and women in a work and life skills program, and tested for cocaine and opiates with each of the kits. The ADx fluoresce nt immunoassay was presumed to be the most sensitive and specific screening method, and comparisons with the two visually-determined test kits support ed this assumption. Of the two visual test kits, ONTRAK was the more specif ic assay and was lower in cost and simplest to perform. Decision makers cou ld employ similar evaluative methods in selecting drug testing materials.