Comparison of polylactide screw and expansion bolt in bioabsorbable fixation with patellar tendon bone graft for anterior cruciate ligament rupture of the knee - A preliminary study
P. Tuompo et al., Comparison of polylactide screw and expansion bolt in bioabsorbable fixation with patellar tendon bone graft for anterior cruciate ligament rupture of the knee - A preliminary study, KNEE SURG S, 7(5), 1999, pp. 296-302
In a preliminary study, 24 patients with rupture of the anterior cruciate l
igament (ACL) were operated an using implants made of self-reinforced poly-
L-lactide (SR-PLLA). The operation method was outside-in bone-tendon-bone r
econstruction. In 10 patients the fixation was made with an SR-PLLA screw w
ith a diameter of 6.3 mm,in 12 with an SR-PLLA expansion plug with a diamet
er of 6.0 mm, and in two cases both implants were used, but these cases wer
e excluded from comparison. The purpose of the study was to evaluate and co
mpare the use and fixation results of these two implants. The follow-up tim
e averaged 3.2 years. Twenty patients attended follow-up. On subjective eva
luations, seven of the eight patients following SR-PLLA screw fixation and
six of the ten after expansion plug fixation regarded their knee as normal
or nearly normal. Arthrometric testing showed the side-to-side difference t
o average 2.9 mm following SR-PLLA screw fixation and 2.6 mm after expansio
n plug fixation (NS). Six of the patients had giving-way symptoms (two afte
r screw fixation and four after plug fixation). The pivot shift test was sl
ightly positive in two patients and positive in one patient after SR-PLLA s
crew fixation, and in three knees slightly positive and in another three kn
ees positive following expansion plug fixation. Radiography showed variatio
n in the location and orientation of the bone channels. Magnetic resonance
imaging was performed in seven cases, and in two cases an edema was found i
n the tendon of the anterior cruciate ligament graft and in six cases the i
mplants were visible. No statistical difference in results between the SR-P
LLA screw and SR-PLLA expansion bolt was noted. Fixation with expansion plu
g seems technically more challenging, with a tendency to inferior results c
ompared to screw fixation. In the absorbable fixation of a bone-tendon-bone
graft there are no metallic artifacts on magnetic resonance imaging and no
need to remove the fixation material regarding the revision surgery.