What is learned in knowledge-related categories? Evidence from typicality and feature frequency judgments

Citation
Tl. Spalding et Gl. Murphy, What is learned in knowledge-related categories? Evidence from typicality and feature frequency judgments, MEM COGNIT, 27(5), 1999, pp. 856-867
Citations number
40
Categorie Soggetti
Psycology
Journal title
MEMORY & COGNITION
ISSN journal
0090502X → ACNP
Volume
27
Issue
5
Year of publication
1999
Pages
856 - 867
Database
ISI
SICI code
0090-502X(199909)27:5<856:WILIKC>2.0.ZU;2-H
Abstract
When a category's features are tied together by integrative knowledge, subj ects learn the category faster than when the features are not directly rela ted. What do subjects learn about the category in such circumstances? Some research has suggested that the subjects can use the knowledge itself in pe rforming the category learning task and, thus, do not learn the details of the category's features. Two experiments investigated this hypothesis by co llecting feature frequency estimates after category learning. The results s howed that integrative knowledge about a category did not decrease subjects ' sensitivity to feature frequency-if anything, knowledge improved it. A th ird experiment found that integrative knowledge did reduce sensitivity to f eature frequency in typicality ratings. The results suggest that knowledge does not inhibit the learning of detailed category information, though it m ay replace its use in some tasks.