So. Suh et M. Blackwell, Molecular phylogeny of the cleistothecial fungi placed in Cephalothecaceaeand Pseudeurotiaceae, MYCOLOGIA, 91(5), 1999, pp. 836-848
Ample evidence from both morphological and molecular characters has accumul
ated to establish that the cleistothecial ascoma has been derived independe
ntly on different occasions from perithecial and apothecial ascomycetes. In
order to clarify, the phylogenetic position of additional species of cleis
tothecial ascomycetes, particularly those placed in the Cephalothecaceae an
d Pseudeurotiaceae of the Eurotiales, partial sequences of the small and la
rge subunit ribosomal DNAs of fourteen taxa were compared with those of oth
er ascomycetes. Phylogenetic trees from both sequence sets showed that some
species in Pseudeurotiaceae are closely related to the taxa of four differ
ent orders of the perithecial ascomycetes (Hypocreales, Sordariales, Ophios
tomatales, and Xylariales). Others (species of Pleuroascus, Connersia, Leuc
oneurospora, and Pseudeurotium) were not closely related to perithecial asc
omycetes or Eurotiales, but to discomycetes and loculoascomycetes. Cephalot
heca sulfurea, the type of the Cephalothecaceae, formed a monophyletic grou
p with pseudeurotiaceous species of Cryptendoxyla and Albertiniella. The ph
ylogeny provided in this study suggests strong ly that all of these fungi a
re excluded from the Eurotiales where they have been placed and that they d
o not form a natural group.