Mf. Martelli et al., Ethical considerations in medicolegal evaluation of neurologic injury and impairment following acquired brain injury, NEUROREHAB, 13(1), 1999, pp. 45-66
Specific training for medicolegal evaluation of persons with neurologic inj
ury or impairment is not always obtained. Most physicians and psychologists
acknowledge that they receive insufficient formal training or education wi
th regard to identifying and coping with the various potential ethical conf
licts that can arise in this arena. However, increasing guidelines are bein
g issued for managing the disparities between conflicting interests and eth
ics for distinctly different roles of independent examiner/expert witness v
ersus treating clinician. In the current paper, relevant ethical issues are
reviewed in order to illustrate ethical conduct as it relates to many comm
on aspects of medicolegal situations. Although some of the current dilemmas
described are unique to the interaction of the American legal and health c
are systems, most have international relevance. Finally recommendations are
provided toward the goal of promoting standardization of objective and eth
ical conduct in medical and psychological practice.