We evaluated the short- to mid-term results of an unconstrained total ankle
prosthesis (S. T. A. R.) with uncemented fixation. Fifty consecutive ankle
replacements were performed in 48 patients between 1996 and 1999. The init
ial diagnosis was posttraumatic osteoarthrosis in 31 cases (62 %), primary
osteoarthrosis in 8 cases (16 %), and systemic joint affection in 11 cases
(22 %), e. g. rheumatoid arthritis (6 cases), hemochromatosis (2 cases), ps
oriasis arthritis (1 case), lupus erythematodes (1 case), and sclerodermia
(1 case). There were two perioperative complications: one superficial wound
dehiscence that healed uneventfully, and one injury to the dorsal foot art
ery that necessitated primary reconstruction. Seven revisions, all in cases
of posttraumatic arthrosis, were necessary: local revision of the fibula f
or painful lateral impingement (3 cases), posteromedial soft tissue revisio
n for painful restriction of dorsiflexion (2 cases), percutaneous lengtheni
ng of the Achilles tendon (1 case), and osteotomy and callus distraction fo
r angular correction after stress fracture of the distal tibia (1 case). At
the last follow-up control, 21 patients (62 %) were very satisfied, 10 pat
ients (29 %) were satisfied, and 3 patients (9 %) were satisfied with reser
vations. The obtained range of motion was 30 degrees (range, 15 to 55 degre
es), with a maximal plantar-flexion of 25 degrees (range, 15 to 45 degrees)
and dorsiflexion of 5 degrees (-3 to 20 degrees). When the AOFAS-Hindfoot-
Score was applied, the 34 patients scored 84.1 points (range, 44 to 100 poi
nts). After settling of the implants within 6 weeks, no migration was noted
in any case, and all implants were considered to be stable. The favorable
results were considered to be a result of the mechanical properties of the
S. T. A. R. total ankle prosthesis that allows for unconstrained motion of
the polyethylene inlay on the tibial component, e, g. anteroposterior trans
lation, mediolateral translation and axial rotation. The success of implant
ation may depend on exact technique, correct hindfoot alignement, sufficien
t capsuloligamentous stability of the ankle, and a solid bane stock. Althou
gh our first results are very encouraging, a longer follow-up is mandatory
to answer the question whether ankle replacement is a viable alternative to
ankle arthrodesis.