Trabecular bone architecture in the distal radius using magnetic resonanceimaging in subjects with fractures of the proximal femur

Citation
S. Majumdar et al., Trabecular bone architecture in the distal radius using magnetic resonanceimaging in subjects with fractures of the proximal femur, OSTEOPOR IN, 10(3), 1999, pp. 231-239
Citations number
31
Categorie Soggetti
Endocrynology, Metabolism & Nutrition
Journal title
OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL
ISSN journal
0937941X → ACNP
Volume
10
Issue
3
Year of publication
1999
Pages
231 - 239
Database
ISI
SICI code
0937-941X(1999)10:3<231:TBAITD>2.0.ZU;2-4
Abstract
To determine whether magnetic resonance (MR)-derived measures of trabecular bone architecture in the distal radius are predictive for prevalent hip fr actures, 20 subjects with hip fractures and 19 age-matched postmenopausal c ontrols were studied. Bone mineral density (BMD) measures at the hip (dual- energy X-ray absorptiometry, DXA) and the distal radius (peripheral quantit ative computed tomography, pQCT) were also obtained. We compared the MR-bas ed structural measures derived in the radius with those in the calcaneus of the same patients. In the radius, images were acquired at an in-plane reso lution of 156 mu m and a slice thickness of 0.5 mm. Stereologic measures su ch as the apparent trabecular thickness (app. Tb.Th), fractional trabecular bone volume (app. BV/TV), trabecular spacing (app. Tb.Sp) and trabecular n umber (app. Tb.N) were derived from the images. Measures of app. Tb.Sp and app. Tb.N in the distal radius showed significant (p<0.05) differences betw een the two groups, as did hip BMD measures. However, radial trabecular BMD measures showed only a marginal difference (p = 0.05). Receiver operating curve analysis was used to determine the diagnostic efficacy of BMD, struct ural measures and a combination of the two. The area under the curve (AUC) for total hip BMD was 0.73, and for radial trabecular BMD was 0.69. AUC for most of the measures of trabecular bone structure at the distal radius was lower than for hip BMD measures; however, AUC for app. Tb.N at the radius was 0.69, comparable to trabecular BMD using pQCT, The AUC for combined BMD (hip) and structure measures was higher (0.87) when radius and calcaneus s tructure was included. Measures of trabecular architecture derived from MR images combined with BMD measures improve the discrimination between subjec ts with hip fractures and normal age-matched controls.