The ubiquitous redox cofactors nicotinamide adenine dinucleotides [NAD
and NADP] are very similar molecules, despite their participation in
substantially different biochemical processes. NADP differs from NAD i
n only the presence of an additional phosphate group esterified to the
2'-hydroxyl group of the ribose at the adenine end and yet NADP is co
nfined with few exceptions to the reactions of reductive biosynthesis,
whereas NAD is used almost exclusively in oxidative degradations, The
discrimination between NAD and NADP is therefore an impressive exampl
e of the power of molecular recognition by proteins, The many known te
rtiary structures of NADP complexes affords the possibility for an ana
lysis of their discrimination. A systematic analysis of several crysta
l structures of NAD (P)-protein complexes show that: 1) the NADP coenz
ymes are more flexible in conformation than those of NAD; 2) although
the protein-cofactor interactions are largely conserved in the NAD com
plexes, they are quite variable in those of NADP; and 3) in both cases
the pocket around the nicotinamide moiety is substrate dependent, The
conserved and variable interactions between protein and cofactors in
the respective binding pockets are reported in detail, Discrimination
between NAD and NADP is essentially a consequence of the overall pocke
t and not of a few residues. A clear finger-print in NAD complexes is
a carboxylate side chain that chelates the diol group at the ribose ne
ar the adenine, whereas in NADP complexes an arginine side chain faces
the adenine plane and interacts with the phosphomonoester. The latter
type of interaction might be a general feature of recognition of nucl
eotides by proteins. Other features such as strand-like hydrogen bondi
ng between the NADP diphosphate moeties and the protein are also signi
ficant. The NADP binding pocket properties should prove useful in prot
ein engineering and design. (C) 1997 Wiley Liss, Inc.