Columbia University experience of detection of circulating cells by RT-PCRPSA in prostate cancer as a predictive factor of stage and biochemical recurrence.

Citation
A. De La Taille et al., Columbia University experience of detection of circulating cells by RT-PCRPSA in prostate cancer as a predictive factor of stage and biochemical recurrence., PROG UROL, 9(3), 1999, pp. 555-561
Citations number
30
Categorie Soggetti
Urology & Nephrology
Journal title
PROGRES EN UROLOGIE
ISSN journal
11667087 → ACNP
Volume
9
Issue
3
Year of publication
1999
Pages
555 - 561
Database
ISI
SICI code
1166-7087(199906)9:3<555:CUEODO>2.0.ZU;2-9
Abstract
Objectives : The Columbia University experience of RT-PCR PSA as a predicti ve factor of stage and biochemical recurrence is reviewed by trying to expl ain its differences. Patients and Methods : 319 patients were included between January 1993 and March 1998. Radical prostatectomy was performed in all patients by the same surgeon. The RT-PCR protocol has been previously described (Katz et at, Ur ology, 1994). Biochemical recurrence was defined by a PSA greater than or e qual to 0.2 ng/ml. Results : Histological examination diagnosed 218 pn and 101 pT3 tumours. Th irty-four of the 218 pn patients (16%) had a positive RT-PCR versus 51 of t he 101 pT3 patients (51%, p<0.001). Analysis of Kaplan-Meier curves showed an 84% recurrence-free survival when RT-PER was negative versus 47% when RT -PCR was positive (Log-rank test, p=0.0002). Multivariate analysis showed t hat independent predictive factors of biochemical recurrence were stage (p= 0.004), Gleason score estimated on the operative specimen (p=0.010) and ser um PSA (p=0.047); RT-PCR (p=0.075), strongly correlated with stage, was not an independent predictive factor By exclusively comparing preoperative par ameters, PSA (p=0.004) and RT-PCR (p=0.006) were found to be independent pr edictive factors compared to digital rectal examination (p=0.371) and Gleas on score on biopsies (p=0.076). Conclusion : In this institution RT-PCR PSA is a predictive parameter of st age and biochemical recurrence. No consensus has yet been reached in the li terature concerning the reference protocol, as each team has developed its own RT-PCR technique applied to its own patient population. Comparison of r esults is therefore difficult.