When two targets (T1 and T2) are displayed in rapid succession, accuracy of
T2 identification varies as a function of the temporal lag between the tar
gets (attentional blink, AB). In some studies, performance has been found t
o be most impaired at Lag 1-namely, when T2 followed T1 directly. In other
studies, T2 performance at Lag 1 has been virtually unimpaired (Lag I spari
ng). In the present work, we examined how Lag 1 sparing is affected by atte
ntional switches between targets displayed in the same location or in diffe
rent locations. We found that Lag 1 sparing does not occur when a spatial s
hift is required between T1 and T2. This suggests that attention cannot be
switched to a new location while the system is busy processing another stim
ulus. The results are explained by a modified version of an attentional gat
ing model (Chun & Potter, 1995; Shapiro & Raymond, 1994).