Sj. English et al., A cloud-detection scheme for use with satellite sounding radiances in the context of data assimilation for numerical weather prediction, Q J R METEO, 125(559), 1999, pp. 2359-2378
Citations number
19
Categorie Soggetti
Earth Sciences
Journal title
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL METEOROLOGICAL SOCIETY
A scheme for detecting cloud-affected radiances is described. The method is
used to determine the probability of cloud-free conditions given the obser
vations and the prior knowledge we have about the atmosphere from a numeric
al weather prediction (NWP) model. This is achieved using a likelihood meth
od. It combines the strengths of some alternative methods (e.g. comparison
of infra-red and microwave channels sounding the lower troposphere and comp
arison of infra-red window channels with sea surface temperature) in a powe
rful and flexible method. It is powerful because it uses different types of
information simultaneously. It is flexible because it makes no assumption
about which instrument is being processed, or what type of prior informatio
n (NWP, climatology etc.) is used. Therefore, it can readily be extended to
new situations and data types (e.g. Advanced TIROS Operational Vertical So
under (ATOVS)). It is suitable for use on general cloud-detection problems,
using combined microwave and infra-red data. It has been tested using TIRO
S Operational Vertical Sounder (TOVS) radiances. The new method has been co
mpared with an alternative cloud-detection method tailored specifically for
TOVS and has been developed to a level of robustness adequate for operatio
nal use. The new method gave very similar results to the alternative method
, especially over the ocean. The differences that did occur have been inves
tigated by comparing with cloud information derived from the Advanced Very
High Resolution Radiometer (AVHRR). Both the alternative method and the new
scheme were found to have deficiencies when dealing with very low cloud. S
ome cloud missed by the existing scheme is identified by the new scheme. Ov
er land, cloud detection is more difficult. The two schemes disagree more o
ften, but validation using AVHRR is also more difficult because of increase
d surface heterogeneity and more variable emissivity and surface temperatur
e errors. The new method is therefore shown to perform at least as well as
an alternative method in operational use, whilst gaining the flexibility re
quired for future systems. The implications for ATOVS are discussed.