Dj. Bakker et al., Implementing atmospheric fate in regulatory risk assessment of pesticides:(How) can it be done?, WATER A S P, 115(1-4), 1999, pp. 257-266
Atmospheric fate of pesticides and their possible effects in ecosystems bey
ond the immediate surrounding of the application site are not actively cons
idered in currently used regulatory risk assessment schemes. Concern with r
espect to atmospheric transport and subsequent deposition of pesticides in
non-target areas is however growing. In this article the results of discuss
ions on the possibilities of implementing atmospheric fate in regulatory ri
sk assessment are presented. It is concluded that implementing atmospheric
fate in regulatory risk assessment schemes is possible and that, from a sci
entific point of view, these schemes should distinguish between pesticides
on the basis of both their possibility/probability to reach non-target area
s and on their toxicity. This implies that application of the precautionary
principle or use of intrinsic pesticide properties alone is not considered
justifiable. It is recommended that the risk assessment scheme should foll
ow a tiered approach. The first tier should be entered only if the existing
regulatory risk assessment procedure, including a local PEC:PNEC calculati
on, has been passed and involves a test for the pesticide's total atmospher
ic emission potential, i.e. its potential for becoming airborne during and
after application. The second tier, which is only entered if the total emis
sion potential is higher than a certain trigger value, should consist of a
PEC:PNEC calculation for regional off-site areas (10-50 km) (tier 2A). If t
he pesticide's atmospheric transport potential is expected to exceed a cert
ain value, the PEC:PNEC ratio should also be calculated for more remote are
as (> 1000 km) (tier 2B).