Influence of image quality on the diagnostic accuracy of dobutamine stressmagnetic resonance imaging in comparison with dobutamine stress ethocardiography for the non-invasive detection of myocardial ischemia
E. Nagel et al., Influence of image quality on the diagnostic accuracy of dobutamine stressmagnetic resonance imaging in comparison with dobutamine stress ethocardiography for the non-invasive detection of myocardial ischemia, Z KARDIOL, 88(9), 1999, pp. 622-630
Citations number
28
Categorie Soggetti
Cardiovascular & Respiratory Systems","Cardiovascular & Hematology Research
The analysis of wall motion abnormalities with dobutamine stress echocardio
graphy is an established method for the detection of myocardial ischemia. W
ith ultrafast magnetic resonance tomography, the application of identical s
tress protocols as used for echocardiography is possible.
In 208 consecutive patients (147 Mt 61 F) with suspected coronary artery di
sease, dobutamine stress echocardiography partially using harmonic imaging
and dobutamine stress magnetic resonance tomography (DSMR) were performed p
rior to cardiac catheterization. DSMR images were acquired during short bre
ath holds in 3 short axis-, a 4-, and a 2-chamber view using a turbo gradie
nt echo technique. Patients were examined at rest and during a standard dob
utamine-atropine scheme until submaximal heart rate was reached. Regional w
all motion was assessed in a 16 segment model. Significant coronary heart d
isease was defined as angiographic greater than or equal to 50 % diameter s
tenosis.
With DSMR, significantly more patients yielded very good (69 %) or good (13
%) image quality in comparison with dobutamine stress echocardiography (20
% and 31 %, p < 0.05). Moderate image quality occurred in 16 % with MR and
41 % with dobutamine stress echocardiography (p < 0.05), 2 % and 8 % were
non-diagnostic. With each technique 18 patients could not be examined (DSE:
emphysema: 10, adipositas: 8; DSMR: claustrophobia: 11, adipositas: 6, con
traindication: 1). Four patients did not reach target heart rate. In 107 pa
tients, significant coronary artery disease was found. With DSMR sensitivit
y was 88.7 % (dobutamine stress echocardiography: 74.3 %; p < 0.05) and spe
cificity 85.7 % (dobutamine stress echocardiography: 69.8 %; p < 0.05). Thi
s difference was most pronounced in the group with moderate echocardiograph
ic image quality.
High dose DSMR is superior to dobutamine stress echocardiography and can re
place this technique especially in patients with moderate echocardiographic
image quality.