In this article I describe and compare ct number of alternative generic str
ategies for the analysis of process data, looking at the consequences of th
ese strategies for emerging theories. I evaluate the strengths and weakness
es of the strategies in terms of their capacity to generate theory that is
accurate, parsimonious, general, and useful and suggest that method and the
ory are inextricably intertwined, that multiple strategies are often advisa
ble, and that no analysis strategy will produce theory without an uncodifia
ble creative leap, however small. Finally, I argue that there is room in th
e organizational research literature for more openness within the academic
community toward a variety of forms of coupling between theory and data.