Indicators of resource use and environmental impact for use in a decision aid for Danish livestock farmers

Authors
Citation
N. Halberg, Indicators of resource use and environmental impact for use in a decision aid for Danish livestock farmers, AGR ECO ENV, 76(1), 1999, pp. 17-30
Citations number
48
Categorie Soggetti
Environment/Ecology
Journal title
AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT
ISSN journal
01678809 → ACNP
Volume
76
Issue
1
Year of publication
1999
Pages
17 - 30
Database
ISI
SICI code
0167-8809(199910)76:1<17:IORUAE>2.0.ZU;2-0
Abstract
Farmers lack well documented sets of farm level indicators to allow their o wn evaluation of environmental impact and to stimulate the development of m ore environment friendly farming practices. A set of farm level indicators of resource use and environmental impact on livestock farms was developed a s part of a decision aid for farmers. The indicators were meant to be part of an extended farm account and included the surpluses and efficiencies of N, P and Cu, the energy use per kg grain and per kg milk or meat, pesticide treatment index (TFI), % unsprayed area, % small biotopes on the farm, and % weeds in grain crops. The indicators were tested on 20 Danish dairy and pig farms over a period of 3 years in order to see if they were suitable fo r use in the farmer's management. The third year, farm gate surpluses varie d between 89 and 265 kg N ha(-1), 2 and 31 kg P ha(-1) and 0.1 and 0.8 kg C u ha(-1). Energy use varied between 2.1 and 4.1 MJ kg(-1) milk and between 14 and 20 MJ kg(-1) live weight pig sold. For all indicators, except energy use per kg grain, the variation in indicator levels between farms was more important than the variation between years within each farm. There was sig nificant variation between farms after correction for stocking rates and so il-and farm types, which suggests that the indicators reflect differences i n management practise on comparable farms. It was demonstrated that these d ifferences between similar farms and between the years on the individual fa rms might be explained by the detailed knowledge of management of the farms ' different subsystems (herd and crops). The information given by the indic ators is discussed from environmental and management points of view and pro blems of defining and interpreting the indicators are identified. Given fur ther development of indicators for soil quality and nature values, the farm level indicators seem a promising way of enabling farmers to include envir onmental topics in their management. (C) 1999 Elsevier Science B.V. All rig hts reserved.