Present classification schemes confuse agroforestry practices, where trees
are intimately associated with agricultural components at a field scale, wi
th the whole farm and forest systems of which they form a part. In fact, it
is common for farming systems to involve the integration of several reason
ably discrete agroforestry practices, on different types of land. The purpo
se of a general classification is to identify different types of agroforest
ry and to group those that are similar, thereby facilitating communication
and the organized storage of information. A new scheme is proposed that use
s the 'practice' rather than the 'system' as the unit of classification. Th
is allows an efficient grouping of practices that have a similar underlying
ecology and prospects for management. A two stage definition of agroforest
ry is proposed that distinguishes an interdisciplinary approach to land use
from a set of integrated land use practices. Four levels of organization a
re recognized through analysis of the role of trees in agricultural landsca
pes: the land use system, categories of land use within systems, discrete g
roups of components (trees, crops, animals) managed together, and functiona
lly connected groups of such discrete practices in time and space. Preceden
ts for this form of analysis are found in the literature and it conforms wi
th generally accepted methods of systems analysis. Classification of major
types of agroforestry practice proceeds primarily according to the componen
ts involved and the predominant usage of land. A secondary scheme further c
lassifies these in terms of the arrangement, density and diversity of the t
ree components involved.