Dr. Danilenko-dixon et al., Universal versus selective gestational diabetes screening: Application of 1997 American Diabetes Association recommendations, AM J OBST G, 181(4), 1999, pp. 798-802
OBJECTIVE: We sought to evaluate the impact of the 1997 American Diabetes A
ssociation gestational diabetes mellitus screening guidelines applied to a
universally screened population.
STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective analysis of 18,504 women universally screened
for gestational diabetes mellitus at Mayo Clinic, Rochester, between Janua
ry 1, 1986, and December 31, 1997, was performed. Diabetic screening consis
ted of plasma glucose determination 1 hour after a 50-g oral glucose challe
nge. Diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus was based on National Diabe
tes Data Group criteria.
RESULTS: Of 564 cases of gestational diabetes mellitus diagnosed during the
study period, 17 (3.0%) would have been missed under the 1997 American Dia
betes Association selective screening guidelines while exempting only 10% o
f this predominantly white population from screening. Screening only women
greater than or equal to 25 years old would have detected 90.4% of gestatio
nal diabetes mellitus cases, whereas the addition of the remaining 3 screen
ing criteria combined would have detected only an additional 6.6% Or cases.
CONCLUSIONS: The proportion of patients with gestational diabetes mellitus
that would remain undiagnosed under the 1997 American Diabetes Association
screening guidelines would be relatively small in our population. However.
implementation of these guidelines would decrease the number of screens by
only 10% while adding significant complexity to the screening process. Yout
h appears to be the most significant protective factor for gestational diab
etes mellitus in our population.