Objectives: Muscle relaxants have different pharmacodynamic profiles in var
ious muscles. Therefore, results obtained for one muscle cannot be extrapol
ated to other muscles. In the adductor pollicis muscle cisatracurium exerts
a pharmacodynamic profile comparable to atracurium, despite the known diff
erence in onset time. However, studies evaluating the neuromuscular effect
of cisatracurium in different muscles are lacking. Accordingly, this study
compares the pharmacodynamic profile of cisatracurium and atracurium in the
orbicularis oculi muscle (00)-which shows a neuromuscular course similar t
o the diaphragm and the laryngeal muscles - and the adductor pollicis muscl
e (AP).
Methods: Forty-five patients (ASA I-II), scheduled for elective spinal surg
ery were anaesthetized with propofol and fentanyl. Endotracheal intubation
was performed without using a muscle relaxant. Neuromuscular transmission w
as monitored using acceleromyography in both muscles. Patients received 0.1
mg/kg (2x ED95) or 0.15 mg/kg (3x ED95) cisatracurium, or 0.5 mg/kg atracu
rium (2x ED95) at random. Onset and recovery times were measured according
to the recommendation of the Copenhagen Consensus Conference.
Results: Onset time was significantly shorter in the 00 than in the AP foll
owing 0.15 mg/kg cisatracurium and 0.5 mg/kg atracurium (P<0.05). No differ
ences in onset time between the two muscles were found after 0.1 mg/kg cisa
tracurium. The recovery of T-1 to 10% of its control was completed sooner i
n the 00 than in the AP in all three groups (P<0.05).
Conclusions: Cisatracurium shows a dose-dependent shorter onset time in the
00 than in the AP. This is consistent with the current view that the onset
of non-depolarizing neuromuscular blockers is more rapid in the 00 than in
the AP. However; at least a dose of 3x ED95 of cisatracurium was necessary
to show a difference in onset time between both muscles. ln contrast, atra
curium is reported to lead to a significantly shorter onset of neuromuscula
r block in the 00 following 2x the ED95. The more rapid recovery of T-1 to
10% of its control in all three groups in the 00 is due to the relative res
istance of this muscle to muscle relaxants.