E. Tallis et al., In-vitro activity of cefepime and other broad-spectrum antimicrobials against several groups of gramnegative bacilli and Staphylococcus aureus, DIAG MICR I, 35(2), 1999, pp. 121-126
The in vitro activity of cefepime was compared with that of amikacin, cefta
zidime, imipenem, ciprofloxacin, and piperacillin-tazobactarn by using the
E-test against five groups of carefully selected organisms: Klebsiella pneu
moniae (68 isololates), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (62), methicillin-susceptibl
e Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) (60), and two groups of Enterobacteriaceae (
60 and 62 isolates, respective ly). The bacteria were subdivided according
to whether the infection was nosocomial or community-acquired, applying acc
epted and predefined criteria. These isolates were obtained from patients a
dmitted to our medical center throughout 1998. We retrospectively compared
antimicrobial susceptibilities of the study sample with those of the +/- 30
00 bacterial strains isolated from blood stream infections since 1990: the
study sample appeared to represent adequately the clinical databank. Presen
ce of extended-spectrum p-lactamase (ESBL) was determined in all groups of
Enterobacteriaceae with the ESBL screening E-test strip. Of the 252 Gram-ne
gative bacilli tested, 242 (96%) were susceptible to cefepime, whereas only
168 (67%) were susceptible to ceftazidime, 211 (84%) to amikacin, and 220
(87%) to piperacillin-tazobactam (p < 0.001). Imipenem was slightly superio
r to cefepime with only seven isolates resistant (3%), six of which were P.
aeruginosa. Cefepime was more active against Enterobacteriaceae than cefta
zidime (93% vs. 72%, p < 0.001). This superiority was most evident against
nosocomial strains of K. pneumoniae, against which cefepime was > three tim
es more active than ceftazidime. The high level of resistance seen in nosoc
omial isolates of K. pneumoniae is consistent with high rates of of product
ion (69%, compared with 15-26% in of her Enterobacteriaceae). The MIG,, of
cefepime to methicillin-sensitive S. aureus was 1.5 mu g/mL, whereas that o
f ceftazidime was 4 mu g/mL; the susceptibility rate of both was 100%. In c
onclusion, cefepime possesses in vitro potencies against MSSA and current c
linical strains of Gram-negative bacilli, many of which harbor resistance t
o other antimicrobial agents. Hence, it seems very suitable for empiric cov
erage of serious nosocomial infections. (C) 1999 Elsevier Science Inc.