Sc. Thomas et Vi. Birss, OXIDE FILM FORMATION ON A MICROCRYSTALLINE AL-ALLOY IN SULFURIC-ACID, Journal of the Electrochemical Society, 144(4), 1997, pp. 1353-1361
The differences in the electrochemical behavior of a rapidly solidifie
d, two-phase (matrix and dispersoid) Al-based alloy containing Fe, V,
and Si (FVS0812 alloy) and the bulk form of its matrix and dispersoid
phases were investigated in sulfuric acid. FVS0812 exhibited generally
higher electrochemical activity than the matrix material due to the p
resence of the very active dispersoid phase in the alloy. Impedance st
udies indicated that the properties of thin films formed on the FVS081
2 and matrix substrates during only 5 min of anodization are similar,
whereas the film formed on the alloy during 2.5 h of anodization was s
ubstantially less resistive and contained a thinner and/or damaged und
erlying barrier oxide compared to a comparable film formed on the matr
ix. Compared to the classical structure of porous Al oxide films with
underlying barrier oxide, the oxide film on FVS0812, as seen by TEM, w
as thinner, with an intermittent barrier oxide underlying a porous oxi
de of contorted morphology. Evidence is seen for the loss of dispersoi
ds from the oxide film, leaving voids throughout its structure, perhap
s the reason for its lack, of physical adherence and its limiting thic
kness.