Integrated assessment (IA) is a maturing research approach aiming at provid
ing decision support on complex. environment-related problems. Although int
erdisciplinary research is a pre-condition for IA, in order to reach the go
als that IA has set it is necessary to go beyond interdisciplinary research
efforts alone. There are two major reasons for this: (i) the nature of dem
ocratic decision-making, and (ii) the nature of complex issues.
The views held by stakeholders and the public at large are an integral part
of democratic decision-making processes. Integrated assessments, which aim
to support decision-making in an appropriate and relevant way, should ther
efore synthesize interdisciplinary scientific insights with a wide variety
of societal views. Furthermore, this paper argues that the sustainability i
ssues with which IA is concerned are complex problems, in the sense that th
ey cannot be fully described or solved in any unique way. One of the reason
s for this is the essentially contested character of the concept 'sustainab
le development'. Against this background the search for techniques of artic
ulation and interaction of multiple perspectives is a major challenge for t
he IA community.
Where the nature of democratic processes asks for taking into account views
of a diversity of actors, the nature of the issues considered demands that
multiple perspectives are included in integrated assessments. Decision sup
port building on a single scientific description is therefore not at all su
fficient for addressing complex problems in a democratic decision-making co
ntext. To this end, this paper argues that it seems promising to develop te
chniques that combine scientific assessment tools with public participation
methods. In order to contribute to the search for such new IA techniques,
this paper discusses some new avenues in IA modelling, and the application
of a well-established social scientific tool, namely focus groups, in integ
rated assessment.