CHARACTERISTICS OF DUAL DIAGNOSIS PATIENTS ADMITTED TO AN URBAN, PUBLIC PSYCHIATRIC-HOSPITAL - AN EXAMINATION OF INDIVIDUAL, SOCIAL, AND COMMUNITY DOMAINS
Ct. Mowbray et al., CHARACTERISTICS OF DUAL DIAGNOSIS PATIENTS ADMITTED TO AN URBAN, PUBLIC PSYCHIATRIC-HOSPITAL - AN EXAMINATION OF INDIVIDUAL, SOCIAL, AND COMMUNITY DOMAINS, The American journal of drug and alcohol abuse, 23(2), 1997, pp. 309-326
The study provides descriptive data on a large, diverse sample of dual
ly diagnosed patients from an urban psychiatric inpatient setting, uti
lizing a comprehensive array of clinical, social and community functio
ning measures. The intent is to provide more useful and reliable infor
mation, particularly concerning African-Americans with a dual diagnosi
s in the public sector. Over a one year period, all persons admitted t
o a public psychiatric hospital with a DSM-III-R psychiatric diagnosis
and a positive screen for substance abuse problems using clinical and
structured measures (n = 486) were interviewed on the Addiction Seven
ty Index (ASI) and other measures to assess community and social funct
ioning, alcohol and drug use, psychiatric problems, and service histor
ies. The majority of participants were found to have serious economic
and employment problems, undesirable living arrangements, limited or c
onflictive family or social relationships, and some record of arrest.
The ASI problem areas most to least in need of treatment were: psychia
tric, alcohol and drug abuse, employment, family/social, legal, and me
dical. Substances most often currently abused were alcohol, cocaine, a
nd cannabis; there was a high rate of polydrug abuse. Participants had
experienced a median of 3.0 previous psychiatric hospitalizations, fe
wer outpatient substance abuse treatments, and limited community menta
l health contact. Some subgroup differences based on gender, age, and
race were found which have implications for community treatment planni
ng. The study results document the extreme heterogeneity in the dually
diagnosed as well as their multiple treatment needs. To better inform
treatment planning, future research on dual diagnosis should attempt
to establish meaningful subgroups relevant to service needs and should
utilize diverse clinical and functioning measures.