Purpose: Results of the Prism Adaptation Study (PAS) indicated that surgica
l success rates were highest when augmented surgery was performed for the i
ncreased angle of deviation in the prism adaptation responders who underwen
t surgery for the prism-determined angle of esotropia. The purpose of this
study was to see if the prism adaptation response process could be performe
d in a shorter time span than dictated in the PAS protocol (minimum, 4-7 da
ys), Methods: After the prescription of appropriate spectacles, patients wi
th acquired stable esotropia were prism adapted and then reexamined and rea
dapted if necessary at 24 hours and 4 to 7 days. The 4- to 7-day visit was
the determining visit in the PAS. The question in this study was whether th
e 24-hour visit would provide the same end point and allow adaptation in a
shorter period of time. In addition, a motor end point was used in this stu
dy, whereas in the PAS, the end point was both motor and sensory. Results:
Thirty-two patients met the entry criteria. Nineteen of the 32 patients bui
lt up their entry angle during the prism adaptation process. Thirty of the
32 patients who left the office stable at the 24-hour visit remained stable
at the 4- to 7-day visit. Conclusion: If the 4- to 7-d ay visit is used as
the "gold" standard, 94% of the patients in this study would not have bene
fited from a longer (beyond 24 hours) wear time of prisms, With the use of
motor stability, prism adaptation can be carried out in a reproducible and
timely fashion.