Dc. Maestes et al., Differential phosphorylation paradigms dictate desensitization and internalization of the N-formyl peptide receptor, J BIOL CHEM, 274(42), 1999, pp. 29791-29795
Following activation by ligand, most G protein-coupled receptors undergo ra
pid phosphorylation, This is accompanied by a drastic decrease in the effic
acy of continued or repeated stimulation, due to receptor uncoupling from G
protein and receptor internalization. Such processing steps have been show
n to be absolutely dependent on receptor phosphorylation in the case of the
N-formyl peptide receptor (FPR), In this study, we report results that ind
icate that the mechanisms responsible for desensitization and internalizati
on are distinct. Using site-directed mutagenesis of the serine and threonin
e residues of the FPR carboxyl terminus, we have characterized regions that
differentially regulate these two processes. Whereas substitution of all 1
1 Ser/Thr residues in the carboxyl terminus prevents both desensitization a
nd internalization, substitution of four Ser/Thr residues between 328-332 b
locks desensitization but has no effect on internalization, Similarly, subs
titution of four Ser/Thr residues between positions 334 and 339 results in
a deficit in desensitization but again no decrease in internalization, sugg
esting that phosphorylation at either site evokes receptor internalization,
whereas maximal desensitization requires phosphorylation at both sites. Th
ese results also indicate that receptor internalization is not involved in
the process of desensitization. Further analysis of the residues between 32
8-332 revealed that restoration either of Ser(328) and Thr(329) or of Thr(3
31) and Ser(332) was sufficient to restore desensitization, suggesting that
phosphorylation within either of these two sites, in addition to sites bet
ween residues 334 and 339, is sufficient to produce desensitization. Taken
together, these results indicate that the mechanisms involved in FPR proces
sing ( uncoupling from G; proteins and internalization) are regulated diffe
rentially by phosphorylation at distinct sites within the carboxyl terminus
of the FPR, The relevance of this paradigm to other G protein-coupled rece
ptors is discussed.