Object. The authors evaluated the importance of endoscopes in eliminating t
he disadvantages of the posterior fossa approach, such as the lack of adequ
ate visualization of the lateral aspect of the internal acoustic canal (IAC
).
Methods. Between 1989 and 1998, 32 patients underwent removal of acoustic n
euroma (AN) via a combined retrosigmoid-retrolabyrinthine approach. Endosco
pes were used at different stages of the operation, and their use was evalu
ated with regard to elimination of the disadvantages of the posterior fossa
approach. All patients in whom AN had been diagnosed underwent surgery in
which a standard retrosigmoid-retrolabyrinthine approach was used. Standard
sinus endoscopes of 0 degrees, 30 degrees, and 70 degrees were introduced
into the cerebellopontine angle before debulking the tumor, and the IAC was
inspected at the end of the operation. Neurovascular integrity as well as
the relationship between the AN and surrounding structures were evaluated.
The IAC was inspected for residual tumor, and if any was found, endoscopica
lly guided tumor dissection was performed.
Conclusions. Endoscopes have facilitated an understanding of the anatomy be
tween an AN and neighboring neurovascular structures. For surgery in which
the posterior fossa approach is used, endoscopes can make operations safer
by eliminating the disadvantages of the approach. In addition to allowing i
nspection of the fundus, it is possible to perform endoscopically guided tu
mor dissection within the IAC.