Recovery of cutaneous pain sensitivity after end-to-side nerve repair in the rat

Citation
U. Kovacic et al., Recovery of cutaneous pain sensitivity after end-to-side nerve repair in the rat, J NEUROSURG, 91(5), 1999, pp. 857-862
Citations number
30
Categorie Soggetti
Neurology,"Neurosciences & Behavoir
Journal title
JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY
ISSN journal
00223085 → ACNP
Volume
91
Issue
5
Year of publication
1999
Pages
857 - 862
Database
ISI
SICI code
0022-3085(199911)91:5<857:ROCPSA>2.0.ZU;2-E
Abstract
Object. The hypothesis that collaterally sprouting axons from an uninjured donor nerve may provide recovery of pain sensitivity in the skin after end- to-side nerve repair was investigated in rats. In addition, the effect of t his technique on the donor nerve was examined. Methods. The distal stump of the transected peroneal nerve was sutured end to side to the intact sural nerve. No epineurial window or perineurial slit was made in the,ural nerve at the site of coaptation. Other nerves in the leg were transected and ligated. Eighteen weeks later, the sural nerve was transected at a site distal from the coaptation site. The residual pain sen sitivity in the peroneal innervation field in the instep was documented usi ng the skin pinch test in three of 11 animals. The area of sensitivity enco mpassed 19 to 40% of the maximum nociceptive innervation area of the normal peroneal nerve. The nerve pinch test revealed functional sensory axons in all communicating peroneal nerves, in which 277 +/- 119 myelinated axons (m ean +/- standard deviation) were found by histological investigation. Conclusions. The authors conclude that at least partial recovery of sensory function due to collateral sprouting of axons after end-to-side nerve repa ir is possible in principle. However. the presence of functional sensory ax ons in the peroneal nerve stumps did not guarantee the recovery of skin sen sitivity to pain in all animals. No functional or morphological evidence of an untoward effect of collateral sprouting into the end-to-side communicat ing nerve was detected in the axons of the donor nerve itself.