Hydrologic, hydraulic, and economic uncertainties impact the economic attra
ctiveness of flood-risk management projects. In particular, uncertainty in
the calculation of expected annual damages introduces uncertainty into econ
omic evaluations. This study develops a hypothetical basin to explore the p
erformance of designs identified by different economic-risk decision models
. A new decision model includes an explicit quantification of uncertainty i
n the marginal net benefits and hence in the reliability of net benefits ge
nerated by the last increment of a project. Monte Carlo analyses show that
the uncertainty in total project benefits may not reveal large uncertaintie
s associated with the last increments of a project. In terms of economic pe
rformance of the different descriptions of hydrologic risk, expected probab
ility and traditional maximum likelihood flood-risk estimators are roughly
equivalent. The new decision model identified less costly projects that ach
ieved nearly the same average net benefits and had a greater probability of
recovering the last dollar spent.