Antiplatelet therapy is recommended for stroke prevention in persons with a
history of thromboembolic stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) that i
s not of cardiac origin.(1) Aspirin was the first antiplatelet agent to be
used in this context and is still the most frequently prescribed preventive
treatment for ischemic stroke.(2) However, because the results of clinical
studies with aspirin have been inconsistent, the dose of aspirin required
for stroke prevention in persons with cerebrovascular disease has been a su
bject of debate among stroke neurologists. In the present discussion, low-d
ose aspirin is generally regarded by the experts as equivalent in effective
ness to high-dose aspirin, and its higher tolerability has the potential to
significantly increase compliance with long-term therapy. Higher aspirin d
oses may have clinical utility in particular settings, but this requires fu
rther study. Despite the controversy, aspirin is now recognized as the trea
tment standard against which other antiplatelet agents are compared. Antipl
atelet agents that may be more effective than aspirin have now been develop
ed. Although each of these agents has been directly compared with aspirin i
n a large, randomized clinical trial, the lack of direct comparisons among
these alternative antiplatelet therapies complicates decisions regarding lo
ng-term care of patients with cerebrovascular disease. An international pan
el of stroke neurologists reports that their selection of antiplatelet ther
apies for patients with prior history of TIA or stroke depends most heavily
on drug efficacy and safety issues and is limited by availability (approva
l status of alternatives).