Six paper machines, three in Scandinavia and three in the middle of Europe,
are studied for their end-market and mill demand patterns. The well-known
demand amplification effect is proven valid for mills with long supply chai
ns, while the situation is different for mills located close to their end-m
arkets. The paper shores that the existing reaction time for market demand
information is not being exploited and that production allocation is not be
ing well matched with real demand Mills close to demand do have an advantag
e over those in Scandinavia, but it is also shown that this advantage could
be overtaken by shorter production cycles and better integrated supply cha
in operations that add up to reliable operational performance with no safel
y margins and buffers. It is concluded that the physical distance between m
ill and market should only show up in transportation costs, but not in poor
ly managed material flow with high buffers and poor customer service result
ing from biased demand information at the mill.