Under the UK Conservative government, GP fundholding represented a major in
crease in the involvement of primary care doctors in the management of loca
l service provision. The Labour government's proposals for Primary Care Gro
ups extends and develops this role. This article examines the experiences o
f fundholding of a group of general practices which participated in an exte
rnal evaluation of their work. Opinions about the merits of fundholding wer
e varied. Doctors and managers expressed concern about the administrative b
urden and questionable clinical value of the scheme. Uncertainties about th
e overall impact upon professional autonomy were also raised. These reserva
tions are consistent with discussions elsewhere questioning the role of doc
tors as managers within health care systems.