Background: Gastrostomy can be performed with a percutaneous fluoroscopic t
echnique, a percutaneous endoscopic technique, or open surgery. Since all t
hree methods are in use at our hospital, we made this retrospective study t
o compare indications, complications, and outcomes for the different techni
ques. Methods and Results: During the period January 1990 to December 1994,
147 patients admitted to Lund University Hospital required gastrostomy. Th
e records of these patients were retrospectively studied. Six patient recor
ds could not be found, and these patients were therefore excluded. Of the r
emaining 141 patients, 94 had undergone fluoroscopic percutaneous gastrosto
my, 12 percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG), and 35 gastrostomy at ope
n surgery. The 30-day overall mortality was 15% in the fluoroscopy group, 1
7% in the endoscopy group, and 29% in the open surgery group. The 30-day mo
rtality as related to the procedure was 3.2% in the fluoroscopy group, 0% i
n the PEG group, and 2.9% among the patients with open surgery. The morbidi
ty related to the procedure was 16%, 8%, and 20%, respectively. For the 30-
day overall mortality and for the procedure-related mortality there was no
statistically significant difference between the groups (P = 0.2019, P = 0.
8215). For the percutaneous procedures the indication was nutrition in most
patients. For the patients receiving gastrostomy at open surgery drainage
was the main indication. Even though the complication rate was higher in th
is group, most complications were minor, and there was only one procedure-r
elated death. Gastrostomy at open surgery is often performed in severely il
l patients. Despite this, it does not seem to cause more complications than
the percutaneous techniques in our study. Conclusion: The study shows that
gastrostomies are safe procedures, with few complications and a low proced
ure-related mortality independent of the technique being used.